Mentions légales du service
Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
Alignment API
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
moex
Alignment API
Commits
82eed0fa
Commit
82eed0fa
authored
14 years ago
by
Jérôme Euzenat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
- suppressed useless type field!
parent
1dcf7bed
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/fr/inrialpes/exmo/align/impl/edoal/EDOALRelation.java
+9
-16
9 additions, 16 deletions
src/fr/inrialpes/exmo/align/impl/edoal/EDOALRelation.java
with
9 additions
and
16 deletions
src/fr/inrialpes/exmo/align/impl/edoal/EDOALRelation.java
+
9
−
16
View file @
82eed0fa
...
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
...
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
package
fr.inrialpes.exmo.align.impl.edoal
;
package
fr.inrialpes.exmo.align.impl.edoal
;
// JE2009: This is a total mess that must be rewritten wrt Direction
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.AlignmentException
;
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.AlignmentException
;
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.AlignmentVisitor
;
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.AlignmentVisitor
;
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.Relation
;
import
org.semanticweb.owl.align.Relation
;
...
@@ -53,7 +51,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -53,7 +51,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
/**
/**
* <p>
* <p>
* Enumeration to distinuish the direction of the mapping.
* Enumeration to distin
g
uish the direction of the mapping.
* </p>
* </p>
* <p>
* <p>
* $Id$
* $Id$
...
@@ -62,6 +60,8 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -62,6 +60,8 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
* @author richi
* @author richi
* @version $Revision: 1.10 $
* @version $Revision: 1.10 $
*/
*/
// JE2011: Direction is now totally local here...
// JE2009: This is a total mess that must be rewritten wrt Direction
// JE2009: THIS SHOULD BE REWRITTEN WITH SUBCLASSES AND NO DIRECTIONS...
// JE2009: THIS SHOULD BE REWRITTEN WITH SUBCLASSES AND NO DIRECTIONS...
/* [JE:22/01/2008]
/* [JE:22/01/2008]
* I make this compliant with 2.2.10 and replacing RDFRuleTYpe
* I make this compliant with 2.2.10 and replacing RDFRuleTYpe
...
@@ -126,36 +126,27 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -126,36 +126,27 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
visitor
.
visit
(
this
);
visitor
.
visit
(
this
);
}
}
/**
* It is intended that the value of the relation is =, < or >.
* But this can be any string in other applications.
*/
protected
String
type
=
null
;
protected
Direction
direction
=
null
;
protected
Direction
direction
=
null
;
/** Creation **/
/** Creation **/
public
EDOALRelation
(
String
t
)
throws
AlignmentException
{
public
EDOALRelation
(
String
t
)
throws
AlignmentException
{
direction
=
Direction
.
getRelation
(
t
);
direction
=
Direction
.
getRelation
(
t
);
if
(
direction
==
null
)
throw
new
AlignmentException
(
"Unknown EDOALRelation : "
+
t
);
if
(
direction
==
null
)
throw
new
AlignmentException
(
"Unknown EDOALRelation : "
+
t
);
type
=
t
;
}
}
/** Creation **/
/** Creation **/
public
EDOALRelation
(
Direction
d
)
{
public
EDOALRelation
(
Direction
d
)
{
type
=
d
.
toString
();
direction
=
d
;
direction
=
d
;
}
}
/** Creation: OLD Stuff should disappear **/
/** Creation: OLD Stuff should disappear **/
public
EDOALRelation
(
String
t
,
Direction
d
)
{
public
EDOALRelation
(
String
t
,
Direction
d
)
{
direction
=
d
;
direction
=
d
;
type
=
t
;
}
}
/** printable format **/
/** printable format **/
public
String
getRelation
(){
public
String
getRelation
(){
return
type
;
return
direction
.
toString
()
;
}
}
/** printable format **/
/** printable format **/
...
@@ -168,6 +159,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -168,6 +159,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
Direction
newDirection
=
null
;
Direction
newDirection
=
null
;
if
(
!
(
r
instanceof
EDOALRelation
)
)
return
null
;
if
(
!
(
r
instanceof
EDOALRelation
)
)
return
null
;
String
rType
=
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getRelation
();
String
rType
=
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getRelation
();
String
type
=
getRelation
();
// Compose types
// Compose types
if
(
type
.
startsWith
(
"Class"
)
)
{
newType
=
"Class"
;
}
if
(
type
.
startsWith
(
"Class"
)
)
{
newType
=
"Class"
;
}
else
if
(
type
.
startsWith
(
"Relation"
)
)
{
newType
=
"Relation"
;
}
else
if
(
type
.
startsWith
(
"Relation"
)
)
{
newType
=
"Relation"
;
}
...
@@ -208,6 +200,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -208,6 +200,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
/** By default the inverse is the relation itself **/
/** By default the inverse is the relation itself **/
public
Relation
inverse
()
{
public
Relation
inverse
()
{
String
type
=
getRelation
();
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"Class"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"Class"
,
direction
);
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"Class"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"Class"
,
direction
);
else
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"ClassRelation"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"RelationClass"
,
direction
);
else
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"ClassRelation"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"RelationClass"
,
direction
);
else
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"ClassAttribute"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"AttributeClass"
,
direction
);
else
if
(
type
.
equals
(
"ClassAttribute"
)
)
return
new
EDOALRelation
(
"AttributeClass"
,
direction
);
...
@@ -230,7 +223,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -230,7 +223,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
/** Are the two relations equal **/
/** Are the two relations equal **/
public
boolean
equals
(
Relation
r
)
{
public
boolean
equals
(
Relation
r
)
{
if
(
r
instanceof
EDOALRelation
){
if
(
r
instanceof
EDOALRelation
){
return
(
type
.
equals
(
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getRelation
()
)
return
(
getRelation
()
.
equals
(
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getRelation
()
)
&&
direction
.
equals
(
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getDirection
()
)
);
&&
direction
.
equals
(
((
EDOALRelation
)
r
).
getDirection
()
)
);
}
else
{
}
else
{
return
false
;
return
false
;
...
@@ -238,7 +231,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -238,7 +231,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
}
}
public
int
hashCode
()
{
public
int
hashCode
()
{
return
5
+
3
*
type
.
hashCode
()
+
7
*
direction
.
hashCode
()
;
return
5
+
7
*
direction
.
hashCode
()
;
}
}
/** Housekeeping **/
/** Housekeeping **/
...
@@ -246,7 +239,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
...
@@ -246,7 +239,7 @@ public class EDOALRelation implements Relation {
/** This is kept for displayig more correctly the result **/
/** This is kept for displayig more correctly the result **/
public
void
write
(
PrintWriter
writer
)
{
public
void
write
(
PrintWriter
writer
)
{
writer
.
print
(
direction
.
toString
());
writer
.
print
(
getRelation
()
);
}
}
}
}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment