1. 03 Oct, 2011 2 commits
  2. 30 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  3. 28 Sep, 2011 2 commits
  4. 27 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  5. 26 Sep, 2011 3 commits
  6. 25 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  7. 24 Sep, 2011 2 commits
    • Guillaume Melquiond's avatar
      Keep track of "ITP" provers and avoid running such provers on unedited proofs. · 406f058e
      Guillaume Melquiond authored
      When the user wants to write a Coq proof, she needs to run Coq on the goal,
      wait five seconds for it to fail (it will fail, otherwise there is no point
      in running Coq on this goal: another prover would have succeeded already),
      and finally edit it. This is a waste of time. So goals run with an
      interactive prover are now marked as unknown until their file is edited.
      
      Interactive provers could have been detected by a nonempty "editor" string,
      but there are interactive provers that don't have dedicated editors, and
      there might be automated provers with dedicated user interfaces. So a new
      field was added to prover descriptions.
      
      TODO: actually run the editor when there is only one selected goal,
      rather than keeping the current three-click method of editing proofs.
      406f058e
    • MARCHE Claude's avatar
      Improved monitoring of running proofs · 841b97b2
      MARCHE Claude authored
      841b97b2
  8. 23 Sep, 2011 3 commits
  9. 22 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  10. 21 Sep, 2011 2 commits
  11. 20 Sep, 2011 10 commits
  12. 18 Sep, 2011 2 commits
  13. 17 Sep, 2011 1 commit
  14. 16 Sep, 2011 3 commits
  15. 15 Sep, 2011 6 commits