1. 16 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  2. 15 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  3. 14 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  4. 05 Feb, 2016 3 commits
  5. 02 Feb, 2016 1 commit
  6. 25 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  7. 23 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  8. 17 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  9. 12 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  10. 16 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  11. 15 Dec, 2015 2 commits
  12. 11 Dec, 2015 3 commits
  13. 10 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  14. 09 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  15. 25 Nov, 2015 1 commit
  16. 17 Nov, 2015 2 commits
  17. 22 Oct, 2015 2 commits
  18. 20 Oct, 2015 2 commits
  19. 19 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  20. 13 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  21. 09 Oct, 2015 3 commits
  22. 06 Oct, 2015 2 commits
    • David Hauzar's avatar
      Marking record fields that will not be shown in counterexample. · f0cdb661
      David Hauzar authored
      Record fields labeled with label model_trace:@hide_field will be not
      shown in counterexample.
      f0cdb661
    • David Hauzar's avatar
      Not appending "." to names of record fields in counterexamples. · da802d43
      David Hauzar authored
      Previously, "." was automatically appended to names stored in
      model_trace label when creating variables corresponding to record
      fields in eval_match and when projecting record fields in the
      transformation intro_projections_counterexmp. Now, this is not done
      and "." must be given in model_trace label of the projection or
      record field.
      
      The reason is that for SPARK, character different from "." (e.g., "'"
      needs to be sometimes appended.
      da802d43
  23. 01 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  24. 23 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  25. 17 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  26. 10 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  27. 09 Sep, 2015 1 commit