1. 04 Apr, 2019 1 commit
    • Sylvain Dailler's avatar
      Add experimental coq realization for Fset and other Set theory · c5d97975
      Sylvain Dailler authored
      The underlying datastructure is not satisfying nor are the proofs but at
      least there is a quick simple realization. It uses ClassicalEpsilon axioms
      such as excluded middle, indefinite_description etc...
      Some theory realizations are very far from reality because the axiom
      characterization is small.
      c5d97975
  2. 07 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  3. 05 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  4. 04 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  5. 19 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  6. 18 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  7. 11 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  8. 07 Feb, 2019 2 commits
  9. 03 Dec, 2018 1 commit
  10. 14 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  11. 16 May, 2018 3 commits
  12. 04 Apr, 2018 2 commits
  13. 22 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  14. 13 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  15. 08 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  16. 06 Mar, 2018 2 commits
  17. 07 Feb, 2018 1 commit
  18. 02 Feb, 2018 1 commit
  19. 01 Feb, 2018 2 commits
  20. 23 Jan, 2018 3 commits
  21. 21 Jan, 2018 1 commit
  22. 19 Jan, 2018 2 commits
  23. 18 Jan, 2018 4 commits
  24. 11 Jan, 2018 1 commit
  25. 20 Dec, 2017 1 commit
    • Sylvain Dailler's avatar
      Cherry picked from a commit of Julien Thierry that aims at improving the · 4756c1cd
      Sylvain Dailler authored
      Coq printer.
      Also adding the "pretty-printed" generated realization.
      
      
      
      N604-045 Coq code easier to read
      
      * src/printer/coq.ml
      Added indentation in Why3's Coq printer using the OCaml Format pretty
      printing module.
      Changed the display of logic formulas and terms only.
      
      (cherry picked from commit 3453a65e0e5fca7e3aa16e22915ee3f079daf1c6)
      
      Conflicts:
      	src/printer/coq.ml
      	src/transform/gnat_split_conj.ml
      4756c1cd
  26. 08 Dec, 2017 1 commit
  27. 01 Dec, 2017 1 commit
  28. 30 Nov, 2017 1 commit
    • Sylvain Dailler's avatar
      Fixing bv theory after changes to theory bv.why. · 43657109
      Sylvain Dailler authored
      The former realization of bv used a bit of sign as the less significant
      bit which should be the most significant. It did not raise problems
      because to_int and to_uint were not linked by an axiom in the .why. Now,
      it is the case, so we rewrote function twos_complement and made some
      straightforward changes to the existing realization (surprisingly proofs
      are the same).
      43657109