- 05 Sep, 2012 3 commits
-
-
François Bobot authored
But: - problem with BuiltIn, Bool, Tuple, Unit and theory - work only with "why" and "whyml" files format
-
François Bobot authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
- 04 Sep, 2012 13 commits
-
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre authored
warning for possibly useless quantifiers (unless a leading underscore is used)
-
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
- 03 Sep, 2012 8 commits
-
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Remove the incorrect Coq realization of PowerReal.pow by Rpower, since the latter is only meaningfully defined for positive first arguments, e.g. Rpower (-1) 3 = 1!
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Replaying programs/vacid_0_binary_heaps/proofs ... FAILED (ret code=1): 37/38 (replay failed) goal 'WP_parameter heapSort.10', prover 'Eprover (1.4)': Timeout (9.97s) instead of Valid (2.93s) (timelimit=10) goal 'Is_heap_when_no_element', prover 'Spass (3.7)': Timeout (13.00s) instead of Valid (5.61s) (timelimit=13)
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Locations and labels were leaking into constant definitions, thus preventing TPTP provers to unify them when equal. Example: const_shdqproofssldtdtsltest_harnessdtmlwdq_17_23_24sh_3 <> const_3.
-
- 01 Sep, 2012 9 commits
-
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Remove axioms from int.Power realization.
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Add monoids to the algebraic hierarchy.
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
MARCHE Claude authored
-
- 31 Aug, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Indeed their inlining causes an exponential growth of the formulas for all the provers that are relying on the "eliminate_if" transformation.
-
Andrei Paskevich authored
-
- 30 Aug, 2012 5 commits
-
-
Andrei Paskevich authored
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
Almost all of them are one-liner changes to account for the additional hypotheses.
-
Guillaume Melquiond authored
-