Skip to content

GitLab

why3
why3
Commit fed48d39 authored by Martin Clochard's avatar Martin Clochard
Browse files
Options

Exemples: portage complet de double-wp vers le nouveau système 

  (+ élimination de la preuve Coq)
parent 220d29bd
Expand all Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 958 additions and 5382 deletions
examples/double_wp/compiler.mlw
View file @ fed48d39
......@@ -24,15 +24,15 @@ module Compile_aexpr
meta rewrite_def function aexpr_post
let rec compile_aexpr (a:aexpr) : hl 'a
ensures { result.pre = trivial_pre /\ hl_correctness result }
ensures { result.post = aexpr_post a result.code.length }
ensures { result <% (trivial_pre,aexpr_post a result.code.length) }
ensures { hl_correctness result }
variant { a }
= let c = match a with
| Anum n -> $ iconstf n
| Avar x -> $ ivarf x
| Aadd a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 ~ $ compile_aexpr a2 ~ $ iaddf ()
| Asub a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 ~ $ compile_aexpr a2 ~ $ isubf ()
| Amul a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 ~ $ compile_aexpr a2 ~ $ imulf ()
| Aadd a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 -- $ compile_aexpr a2 -- $ iaddf ()
| Asub a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 -- $ compile_aexpr a2 -- $ isubf ()
| Amul a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 -- $ compile_aexpr a2 -- $ imulf ()
end in
hoare trivial_pre c (aexpr_post a c.wcode.length)
......@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ module Compile_bexpr
meta rewrite_def function exec_cond
let rec compile_bexpr (b:bexpr) (cond:bool) (ofs:ofs) : hl 'a
ensures { result.pre = trivial_pre /\ hl_correctness result }
ensures { result.post =
bexpr_post b cond (result.code.length + ofs) result.code.length }
ensures { let len = result.code.length in
result <% (trivial_pre,bexpr_post b cond (len + ofs) len) }
ensures { hl_correctness result }
variant { b }
= let c = match b with
| Btrue -> $ if cond then ibranchf ofs else inil ()
......@@ -85,10 +85,10 @@ module Compile_bexpr
| Band b1 b2 ->
let c2 = $ compile_bexpr b2 cond ofs % exec_cond b1 true in
let ofs = if cond then length c2.wcode else ofs + length c2.wcode in
$ compile_bexpr b1 false ofs ~ c2
| Beq a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 ~ $ compile_aexpr a2 ~
$ compile_bexpr b1 false ofs -- c2
| Beq a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 -- $ compile_aexpr a2 --
$ if cond then ibeqf ofs else ibnef ofs
| Ble a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 ~ $ compile_aexpr a2 ~
| Ble a1 a2 -> $ compile_aexpr a1 -- $ compile_aexpr a2 --
$ if cond then iblef ofs else ibgtf ofs
end in
let ghost post = bexpr_post b cond (c.wcode.length + ofs) c.wcode.length in
......@@ -145,40 +145,48 @@ module Compile_com
pi = p /\ s0 = si /\ exists mf. ceval m0 c mf /\ ceval mi c mf
meta rewrite_def function loop_invariant
function loop_post (c : com) (len: pos) : pre ('a,machine_state) =
fun x p msf -> let VMS _ s0 m0 = snd x in let VMS pf sf mf = msf in
pf = p + len /\ s0 = sf /\ ceval m0 c mf
meta rewrite_def function loop_post
function loop_variant (c:com) (test:bexpr) : post 'a =
fun _ _ msj msi -> let VMS pj sj mj = msj in let VMS pi si mi = msi in
pj = pi /\ sj = si /\ ceval mi c mj /\ beval mi test
meta rewrite_def function loop_variant
ceval mi c mj /\ beval mi test
lemma loop_variant_lemma : forall c test,x:'a,p msj msi.
loop_variant c test x p msj msi =
let VMS pj sj mj = msj in let VMS pi si mi = msi in
ceval mi c mj /\ beval mi test
meta rewrite lemma loop_variant_lemma
(* Well-foundedness of the loop variant. *)
lemma loop_variant_acc : forall c test,x:'a,p mi mj.
let wh = Cwhile test c in let var = (loop_variant c test x p) in
(ceval mi wh mj -> forall pi si. acc var (VMS pi si mi))
by forall pi si mi mj mf. ceval mi c mj /\ beval mi test ->
ceval mj wh mf /\ (forall pj sj. acc var (VMS pj sj mj)) ->
acc var (VMS pi si mi) by
(forall pk sk mk. var (VMS pk sk mk) (VMS pi si mi) -> mk = mj)
let rec compile_com (cmd: com) : hl 'a
ensures { result.pre = com_pre cmd /\ hl_correctness result }
ensures { result.post = com_post cmd result.code.length }
ensures { hl_correctness result }
ensures { let len = result.code.length in
result <% (com_pre cmd,com_post cmd len) }
variant { cmd }
= let res = match cmd with
| Cskip -> $ inil ()
| Cassign x a -> $ compile_aexpr a ~ $ isetvarf x
| Cseq cmd1 cmd2 -> $ compile_com cmd1 ~ $ compile_com cmd2
| Cassign x a -> $ compile_aexpr a -- $ isetvarf x
| Cseq cmd1 cmd2 -> $ compile_com cmd1 -- $ compile_com cmd2
| Cif cond cmd1 cmd2 -> let code_false = compile_com cmd2 in
let code_true = $ compile_com cmd1 ~ $ ibranchf code_false.code.length in
$ compile_bexpr cond false code_true.wcode.length ~
(code_true % exec_cond cond true) ~
let code_true = $ compile_com cmd1 -- $ ibranchf code_false.code.length in
$ compile_bexpr cond false code_true.wcode.length --
(code_true % exec_cond cond true) --
($ code_false % exec_cond_old cond false)
| Cwhile test body -> let code_body = compile_com body in
| Cwhile test body ->
let code_body = compile_com body in
let body_length = length code_body.code + 1 in
let code_test = compile_bexpr test false body_length in
let ofs = length code_test.code + body_length in
let wp_while = $ code_test ~
($ code_body ~ $ ibranchf (- ofs)) % exec_cond test true in
let ghost inv = loop_invariant cmd in
let ghost var = loop_variant body test in
let ghost post = loop_post cmd ofs in
let hl_while = hoare inv wp_while (loop_progress inv post var) in
$ inil () ~ $ make_loop_hl hl_while inv post var
let wp_while = $ code_test --
($ code_body -- $ ibranchf (- ofs)) % exec_cond test true in
let ghost inv = loop_invariant cmd in
let ghost var = loop_variant body test in
$ inil () -- make_loop wp_while inv (exec_cond test true) var
end in
hoare (com_pre cmd) res (com_post cmd res.wcode.length)
......@@ -188,7 +196,7 @@ module Compile_com
transition_star c (VMS p s m) (VMS (p + length result) s m') }
= let res = compile_com com : hl unit in
assert { forall c p s m m'. ceval m com m' -> codeseq_at c p res.code ->
res.pre () p (VMS p s m) && (forall ms'. res.post () p (VMS p s m) ms' ->
res.pre () p (VMS p s m) && (forall ms'. res.post () p (VMS p s m) ms' ->
ms' = VMS (p + length res.code) s m') };
res.code
......
examples/double_wp/compiler/why3session.xml
View file @ fed48d39
This source diff could not be displayed because it is too large. You can view the blob instead.
examples/double_wp/imp/why3session.xml
View file @ fed48d39
......@@ -2,191 +2,64 @@
<!DOCTYPE why3session PUBLIC "-//Why3//proof session v5//EN"
"http://why3.lri.fr/why3session.dtd">
<why3session shape_version="4">
<prover id="0" name="CVC4" version="1.4" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="2" name="Alt-Ergo" version="0.99.1" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<file name="../imp.why" expanded="true">
<theory name="Imp" sum="5b7f48232493468c9e3f22d1ebe7e7f5">
<prover id="0" name="Alt-Ergo" version="1.30" timelimit="1" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<file name="../imp.why">
<theory name="Imp" sum="2d3400b438aea0519cb1313c5cfda33e">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux">
<transf name="induction_pr">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1" expl="1.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.01" steps="8"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="20"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="18"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="19"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="19"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="10"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.1.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.01" steps="19"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="41"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2" expl="2.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="20"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="26"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="26"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.2.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="26"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.33" steps="473"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3" expl="3.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="18"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.11"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="22"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.3.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="24"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.23" steps="391"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4" expl="4.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="19"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="26"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.03"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.4.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="25"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.06" steps="157"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5" expl="5.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="19"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="26"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.03"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.5.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.06" steps="153"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6" expl="6.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="10"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="22"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="23"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="11"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.6.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="21"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="50"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7" expl="7.">
<transf name="inversion_pr">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.1" expl="1.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="19"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.2" expl="2.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="26"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.3" expl="3.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="24"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.4" expl="4.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.5" expl="5.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="25"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.6" expl="6.">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="21"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic_aux.7.7" expl="7.">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.08"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.28" steps="444"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="ceval_deterministic">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.02"/></proof>
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.01" steps="27"/></proof>
</goal>
</theory>
</file>
......
examples/double_wp/logic.mlw
View file @ fed48d39
......@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ module Compiler_logic
function snd (p: ('a,'b)) : 'b = let (_,y) = p in y
meta rewrite_def function snd
predicate (-->) (x y:'a) = "rewrite" x = y
meta rewrite_def predicate (-->)
(* Unary predicates over machine states *)
type pred = machine_state -> bool
......@@ -30,14 +33,25 @@ module Compiler_logic
type post 'a = 'a -> pos -> rel
(* Hoare triples with explicit pre & post *)
type hl 'a = { code: code; ghost pre : pre 'a; ghost post: post 'a }
type hl 'a = { code: code; ghost pre : pre {'a}; ghost post: post {'a} }
(* (<%): pack the pre/post rewriting.
lock is an artifact to prevent unrolling of
h's definition recursively. *)
let function lock () : (int,int) =
ensures { result = (0,0) }
while false do variant { 0 } () done; (0,0)
predicate (<%) (h:hl 'a) (x:(pre 'a,post 'a)) =
let (pr,ps) = x in
h --> { code = let (_,_) = lock () in h.code; pre = pr; post = ps }
meta rewrite_def predicate (<%)
(* Predicate transformer type. Same auxiliary variables as for
Hoare triples. *)
type wp_trans 'a = 'a -> pos -> pred -> pred
(* Code with backward predicate transformer. *)
type wp 'a = { wcode : code; ghost wp : wp_trans 'a }
type wp 'a = { wcode : code; ghost wp : wp_trans {'a} }
(* Machine transition valid whatever the global code is. *)
predicate contextual_irrelevance (c:code) (p:pos) (ms1 ms2:machine_state) =
......@@ -53,12 +67,9 @@ module Compiler_logic
forall x:'a,p post ms. (code.wp x p post) ms ->
exists ms'. post ms' /\ contextual_irrelevance code.wcode p ms ms'
(* WP combinator for sequence. Similar to the standard WP calculus
for sequence. The initial machine state is memorized in auxiliary
variables for potential use in the second code specification. *)
(*** Technical: Why3 refuse the logic call in program,
so we cannot define it in function of (wp 'a) arguments only. *)
function seq_wp
(l1:int) (w1:wp_trans 'a) (w2:wp_trans ('a,machine_state)) : wp_trans 'a =
fun x p q ms -> w1 x p (w2 (x,ms) (p+l1) q) ms
......@@ -69,10 +80,10 @@ module Compiler_logic
meta rewrite lemma seq_wp_lemma
(* Code combinator for sequence, with wp. *)
let (~) (s1 : wp 'a) (s2 : wp ('a, machine_state)) : wp 'a
let (--) (s1 : wp 'a) (s2 : wp ('a, machine_state)) : wp 'a
requires { wp_correctness s1 /\ wp_correctness s2 }
ensures { result.wcode.length = s1.wcode.length + s2.wcode.length }
ensures { result.wp = seq_wp s1.wcode.length s1.wp s2.wp }
ensures { result.wp --> seq_wp s1.wcode.length s1.wp s2.wp }
ensures { wp_correctness result }
= let code = s1.wcode ++ s2.wcode in
let res = { wcode = code; wp = seq_wp s1.wcode.length s1.wp s2.wp } in
......@@ -94,9 +105,9 @@ module Compiler_logic
(* Code combinator for conditional execution.
Similar to WP calculus for (if cond then s). *)
let (%) (s:wp 'a) (ghost cond:pre 'a) : wp 'a
let (%) (s:wp 'a) (ghost cond:pre {'a}) : wp 'a
requires { wp_correctness s }
ensures { result.wp = fork_wp s.wp cond }
ensures { result.wp --> fork_wp s.wp cond }
ensures { result.wcode.length = s.wcode.length /\ wp_correctness result }
= { wcode = s.wcode; wp = fork_wp s.wp cond }
......@@ -115,16 +126,17 @@ module Compiler_logic
let ($_) (c:hl 'a) : wp 'a
requires { hl_correctness c }
ensures { result.wcode.length = c.code.length }
ensures { result.wp = towp_wp c.pre c.post /\ wp_correctness result }
ensures { result.wp --> towp_wp c.pre c.post }
ensures { wp_correctness result }
= { wcode = c.code; wp = towp_wp c.pre c.post }
(* Equip code with pre/post-condition. That is here that proof happen.
(P -> wp (c,Q)). Anologous to checking function/abstract block
specification. *)
let hoare (ghost pre:pre 'a) (c:wp 'a) (ghost post:post 'a) : hl 'a
let hoare (ghost pre:pre {'a}) (c:wp 'a) (ghost post:post {'a}) : hl 'a
requires { wp_correctness c }
requires { forall x p ms. pre x p ms -> (c.wp x p (post x p ms)) ms }
ensures { result.pre = pre /\ result.post = post }
ensures { result <% (pre,post) }
ensures { result.code.length = c.wcode.length /\ hl_correctness result}
= { code = c.wcode ; pre = pre; post = post }
......@@ -135,33 +147,43 @@ module Compiler_logic
inductive acc ('a -> 'a -> bool) 'a =
| Acc : forall r, x:'a. (forall y. r y x -> acc r y) -> acc r x
(* An iteration of the loop should make progress
towards the postcondition: either achieve the postcondition,
or preserve the invariant and "decrease" according to
a well-founded relation. *)
function loop_progress (inv post:pre 'a) (var:post 'a) : post 'a =
fun x p ms ms' -> (inv x p ms' /\ var x p ms' ms) \/ post x p ms'
meta rewrite_def function loop_progress
function forget_old (post:pre 'a) : post 'a =
fun x p _ -> post x p
meta rewrite_def function forget_old
(* Variant of hoare triplet introduction rule for looping code.
- inv is the loop invariant
- post is the loop postcondition
- var is a well-founded relation over states satisfying the
invariant. *)
let make_loop_hl (c:hl 'a) (ghost inv post:pre 'a) (ghost var:post 'a) : hl 'a
requires { hl_correctness c }
requires { forall x p ms. inv x p ms -> acc (var x p) ms }
requires { c.pre = inv }
requires { c.post = loop_progress inv post var }
ensures { result.pre = inv /\ result.post = forget_old post }
ensures { result.code.length = c.code.length /\ hl_correctness result }
= let res = { code = c.code ; pre = inv ; post = forget_old post } in
assert { forall x p ms. inv x p ms -> acc (var x p) ms && exists ms'.
contextual_irrelevance res.code p ms ms' /\ forget_old post x p ms ms' };
(* Utility: some flavor of conjonction. *)
function pconj (p1:pred) (x:machine_state)
(p2:machine_state -> pred) : pred =
fun y -> p1 y && p2 y x
lemma pconj_lemma : forall p1 x p2 y. pconj p1 x p2 y <-> p1 y && p2 y x
meta rewrite lemma pconj_lemma
(* WP combinator for looping construction. Similar to weakest precondition
for while loops. *)
function loop_wp (w:wp_trans 'a) (inv cont:pre 'a)
(var:post 'a) : wp_trans 'a =
fun x p q ms -> inv x p ms && acc (var x p) ms && forall ms'. inv x p ms' ->
if cont x p ms'
then w x p (pconj (inv x p) ms' (var x p)) ms'
else w x p q ms'
lemma loop_wp_lemma : forall w:wp_trans 'a,inv cont var x p q ms.
loop_wp w inv cont var x p q ms <->
inv x p ms && acc (var x p) ms && forall ms'. inv x p ms' ->
(cont x p ms' -> w x p (pconj (inv x p) ms' (var x p)) ms')
/\ (not cont x p ms' -> w x p q ms')
meta rewrite lemma loop_wp_lemma
(* Code combinator for looping construct. *)
let make_loop (c:wp 'a) (ghost inv cont:pre {'a})
(ghost var:post {'a}) : wp 'a
requires { wp_correctness c }
ensures { result.wp --> loop_wp c.wp inv cont var }
ensures { wp_correctness result }
ensures { result.wcode.length = c.wcode.length }
= let res = { wcode = c.wcode; wp = loop_wp c.wp inv cont var } in
assert { forall x p q ms0. res.wp x p q ms0 ->
forall ms. inv x p ms -> acc (var x p) ms ->
exists ms'. contextual_irrelevance res.wcode p ms ms' /\ q ms'
};
res
end
examples/double_wp/logic/why3session.xml
View file @ fed48d39
......@@ -2,84 +2,63 @@
<!DOCTYPE why3session PUBLIC "-//Why3//proof session v5//EN"
"http://why3.lri.fr/why3session.dtd">
<why3session shape_version="4">
<prover id="0" name="CVC3" version="2.4.1" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="1" name="CVC4" version="1.4" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="2" name="Alt-Ergo" version="0.95.2" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="3" name="CVC4" version="1.3" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="0" name="CVC4" version="1.4" timelimit="5" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<prover id="1" name="Alt-Ergo" version="1.30" timelimit="1" steplimit="0" memlimit="1000"/>
<file name="../logic.mlw">
<theory name="Compiler_logic" sum="c12240d535cc2c746aa01470b9422232">
<theory name="Compiler_logic" sum="bbb4f6b95cf0f6f786305cc906cdbf54">
<goal name="VC lock" expl="VC for lock">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.01" steps="5"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="seq_wp_lemma">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="8"/></proof>
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="5"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~" expl="VC for infix ~">
<goal name="VC infix --" expl="VC for infix --">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.1" expl="1. assertion">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.1.1" expl="1. assertion">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.14" steps="90"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.1.2" expl="2. assertion">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.1.2.1" expl="1. VC for infix ~">
<transf name="compute_specified">
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.1.2.1.1" expl="1. VC for infix ~">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.05" steps="31"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
</transf>
<goal name="VC infix --.1" expl="1. assertion">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.05" steps="71"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.2" expl="2. postcondition">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="7"/></proof>
<goal name="VC infix --.2" expl="2. postcondition">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="8"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter infix ~.3" expl="3. postcondition">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="18"/></proof>
<goal name="VC infix --.3" expl="3. postcondition">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="5"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="VC infix --.4" expl="4. postcondition">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="20"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="fork_wp_lemma">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="8"/></proof>
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="15"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter infix %" expl="VC for infix %">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter infix %.1" expl="1. postcondition">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.10"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
<goal name="VC infix %" expl="VC for infix %">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.07"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="towp_wp_lemma">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.02" steps="12"/></proof>
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="13"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter prefix $" expl="VC for prefix $">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="11"/></proof>
<goal name="VC prefix $" expl="VC for prefix $">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.05" steps="11"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter hoare" expl="VC for hoare">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter hoare.1" expl="1. postcondition">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.07"/></proof>
<proof prover="3"><result status="valid" time="0.07"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
<goal name="VC hoare" expl="VC for hoare">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.07"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl" expl="VC for make_loop_hl">
<goal name="pconj_lemma">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.03" steps="8"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="loop_wp_lemma">
<proof prover="1"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="49"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="VC make_loop" expl="VC for make_loop">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1" expl="1. assertion">
<goal name="VC make_loop.1" expl="1. assertion">
<transf name="split_goal_wp">
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1.1" expl="1. assertion">
<proof prover="2"><result status="valid" time="0.04" steps="9"/></proof>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1.2" expl="2. assertion">
<goal name="VC make_loop.1.1" expl="1. assertion">
<transf name="induction_pr">
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1.2.1" expl="1. assertion">
<goal name="VC make_loop.1.1.1" expl="1. assertion">
<transf name="simplify_trivial_quantification_in_goal">
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1.2.1.1" expl="1. VC for make_loop_hl">
<transf name="compute_specified">
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.1.2.1.1.1" expl="1. VC for make_loop_hl">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.09"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
<goal name="VC make_loop.1.1.1.1" expl="1. VC for make_loop">
<proof prover="0"><result status="valid" time="0.25"/></proof>
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
......@@ -87,8 +66,14 @@
</goal>
</transf>
</goal>
<goal name="WP_parameter make_loop_hl.2" expl="2. postcondition">