Commit 72ae1e01 authored by MARCHE Claude's avatar MARCHE Claude
Browse files

WP: update Coq proofs

parent ab0785fa
......@@ -211,15 +211,22 @@
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="258" loccnumb="7" loccnume="20"
verified="false"
expanded="true">
expanded="false">
<goal
name="Test13"
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="265" loccnumb="5" loccnume="11"
sum="3c0145de004805afee4e91f7151c1d16"
proved="false"
proved="true"
expanded="false"
shape="ainfix =aeval_termamy_sigmaamy_piaTconstc13aVintc13">
<proof
prover="0"
timelimit="5"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="valid" time="0.03"/>
</proof>
</goal>
<goal
name="Test42"
......@@ -253,9 +260,30 @@
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="277" loccnumb="5" loccnume="10"
sum="823cc8d3bbaf972bd76e091707e41d1d"
proved="false"
proved="true"
expanded="false"
shape="Lc0ainfix =agetV1V0aVintc42Iaone_stepamy_sigmaamy_piaSassignV0aTconstc42V1V2aSskipF">
<proof
prover="1"
timelimit="5"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="valid" time="0.10"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="0"
timelimit="5"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="valid" time="0.09"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="2"
timelimit="5"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="valid" time="0.12"/>
</proof>
</goal>
<goal
name="If42"
......@@ -271,8 +299,8 @@
name="HoareLogic"
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="297" loccnumb="7" loccnume="17"
verified="false"
expanded="true">
verified="true"
expanded="false">
<goal
name="consequence_rule"
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
......@@ -392,50 +420,16 @@
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="334" loccnumb="6" loccnume="21"
sum="189817af6b3e698754f066618e6681a5"
proved="false"
expanded="true"
proved="true"
expanded="false"
shape="avalid_tripleaFimpliesV0V1aSassertV0V1F">
<proof
prover="4"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.40"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="1"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.15"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="0"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.21"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="3"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false"><unedited/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="2"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.62"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="5"
timelimit="3"
edited="wp2_HoareLogic_assert_rule_ext_1.v"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.50"/>
<result status="valid" time="0.98"/>
</proof>
</goal>
<goal
......@@ -443,50 +437,16 @@
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="338" loccnumb="6" loccnume="16"
sum="a1136f47e552feb3c79f635b836bda93"
proved="false"
expanded="true"
proved="true"
expanded="false"
shape="avalid_tripleV1aSwhileV0V1V2aFandaFnotaFtermV0V1Iavalid_tripleaFandaFtermV0V1V2V1F">
<proof
prover="4"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.09"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="1"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.11"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="0"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.22"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="3"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false"><unedited/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="2"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.34"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="5"
timelimit="3"
edited="wp2_HoareLogic_while_rule_1.v"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.32"/>
<result status="valid" time="1.19"/>
</proof>
</goal>
<goal
......@@ -494,50 +454,16 @@
locfile="wp2/../wp2.mlw"
loclnum="343" loccnumb="6" loccnume="20"
sum="2b6ff464c6bc40e843b0c4d2e7536e09"
proved="false"
expanded="true"
proved="true"
expanded="false"
shape="avalid_tripleV2aSwhileV0V1V3aFandaFnotaFtermV0V2Iavalid_tripleaFandaFtermV0V2V3V2Iavalid_fmlaaFimpliesV2V1F">
<proof
prover="4"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.44"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="1"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.04"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="0"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.11"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="3"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false"><unedited/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="2"
timelimit="3"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.31"/>
</proof>
<proof
prover="5"
timelimit="3"
edited="wp2_HoareLogic_while_rule_ext_1.v"
obsolete="false"
archived="false">
<result status="timeout" time="3.12"/>
<result status="valid" time="1.19"/>
</proof>
</goal>
</theory>
......
(* This file is generated by Why3's Coq driver *)
(* Beware! Only edit allowed sections below *)
Require Import ZArith.
Require Import Rbase.
Require int.Int.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive datatype :=
| Tint : datatype
| Tbool : datatype .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive operator :=
| Oplus : operator
| Ominus : operator
| Omult : operator
| Ole : operator .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition ident := Z.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive term :=
| Tconst : Z -> term
| Tvar : Z -> term
| Tderef : Z -> term
| Tbin : term -> operator -> term -> term .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive fmla :=
| Fterm : term -> fmla
| Fand : fmla -> fmla -> fmla
| Fnot : fmla -> fmla
| Fimplies : fmla -> fmla -> fmla
| Flet : Z -> term -> fmla -> fmla
| Fforall : Z -> datatype -> fmla -> fmla .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition implb(x:bool) (y:bool): bool := match (x,
y) with
| (true, false) => false
| (_, _) => true
end.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive value :=
| Vint : Z -> value
| Vbool : bool -> value .
Parameter map : forall (a:Type) (b:Type), Type.
Parameter get: forall (a:Type) (b:Type), (map a b) -> a -> b.
Implicit Arguments get.
Parameter set: forall (a:Type) (b:Type), (map a b) -> a -> b -> (map a b).
Implicit Arguments set.
Axiom Select_eq : forall (a:Type) (b:Type), forall (m:(map a b)),
forall (a1:a) (a2:a), forall (b1:b), (a1 = a2) -> ((get (set m a1 b1)
a2) = b1).
Axiom Select_neq : forall (a:Type) (b:Type), forall (m:(map a b)),
forall (a1:a) (a2:a), forall (b1:b), (~ (a1 = a2)) -> ((get (set m a1 b1)
a2) = (get m a2)).
Parameter const: forall (b:Type) (a:Type), b -> (map a b).
Set Contextual Implicit.
Implicit Arguments const.
Unset Contextual Implicit.
Axiom Const : forall (b:Type) (a:Type), forall (b1:b) (a1:a),
((get (const b1:(map a b)) a1) = b1).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition env := (map Z value).
Parameter eval_bin: value -> operator -> value -> value.
Axiom eval_bin_def : forall (x:value) (op:operator) (y:value), match (x,
y) with
| ((Vint x1), (Vint y1)) =>
match op with
| Oplus => ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vint (x1 + y1)%Z))
| Ominus => ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vint (x1 - y1)%Z))
| Omult => ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vint (x1 * y1)%Z))
| Ole => ((x1 <= y1)%Z -> ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vbool true))) /\
((~ (x1 <= y1)%Z) -> ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vbool false)))
end
| (_, _) => ((eval_bin x op y) = (Vbool false))
end.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Fixpoint eval_term(sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(t:term) {struct t}: value :=
match t with
| (Tconst n) => (Vint n)
| (Tvar id) => (get pi id)
| (Tderef id) => (get sigma id)
| (Tbin t1 op t2) => (eval_bin (eval_term sigma pi t1) op (eval_term sigma
pi t2))
end.
Unset Implicit Arguments.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Fixpoint eval_fmla(sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(f:fmla) {struct f}: Prop :=
match f with
| (Fterm t) => ((eval_term sigma pi t) = (Vbool true))
| (Fand f1 f2) => (eval_fmla sigma pi f1) /\ (eval_fmla sigma pi f2)
| (Fnot f1) => ~ (eval_fmla sigma pi f1)
| (Fimplies f1 f2) => (eval_fmla sigma pi f1) -> (eval_fmla sigma pi f2)
| (Flet x t f1) => (eval_fmla sigma (set pi x (eval_term sigma pi t)) f1)
| (Fforall x Tint f1) => forall (n:Z), (eval_fmla sigma (set pi x (Vint n))
f1)
| (Fforall x Tbool f1) => forall (b:bool), (eval_fmla sigma (set pi x
(Vbool b)) f1)
end.
Unset Implicit Arguments.
Parameter subst_term: term -> Z -> Z -> term.
Axiom subst_term_def : forall (e:term) (r:Z) (v:Z),
match e with
| (Tconst _) => ((subst_term e r v) = e)
| (Tvar _) => ((subst_term e r v) = e)
| (Tderef x) => ((r = x) -> ((subst_term e r v) = (Tvar v))) /\
((~ (r = x)) -> ((subst_term e r v) = e))
| (Tbin e1 op e2) => ((subst_term e r v) = (Tbin (subst_term e1 r v) op
(subst_term e2 r v)))
end.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Fixpoint fresh_in_term(id:Z) (t:term) {struct t}: Prop :=
match t with
| (Tconst _) => True
| (Tvar v) => ~ (id = v)
| (Tderef _) => True
| (Tbin t1 _ t2) => (fresh_in_term id t1) /\ (fresh_in_term id t2)
end.
Unset Implicit Arguments.
Axiom eval_subst_term : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(e:term) (x:Z) (v:Z), (fresh_in_term v e) -> ((eval_term sigma pi
(subst_term e x v)) = (eval_term (set sigma x (get pi v)) pi e)).
Axiom eval_term_change_free : forall (t:term) (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map
Z value)) (id:Z) (v:value), (fresh_in_term id t) -> ((eval_term sigma
(set pi id v) t) = (eval_term sigma pi t)).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Fixpoint fresh_in_fmla(id:Z) (f:fmla) {struct f}: Prop :=
match f with
| (Fterm e) => (fresh_in_term id e)
| ((Fand f1 f2)|(Fimplies f1 f2)) => (fresh_in_fmla id f1) /\
(fresh_in_fmla id f2)
| (Fnot f1) => (fresh_in_fmla id f1)
| (Flet y t f1) => (~ (id = y)) /\ ((fresh_in_term id t) /\
(fresh_in_fmla id f1))
| (Fforall y ty f1) => (~ (id = y)) /\ (fresh_in_fmla id f1)
end.
Unset Implicit Arguments.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Set Implicit Arguments.
Fixpoint subst(f:fmla) (x:Z) (v:Z) {struct f}: fmla :=
match f with
| (Fterm e) => (Fterm (subst_term e x v))
| (Fand f1 f2) => (Fand (subst f1 x v) (subst f2 x v))
| (Fnot f1) => (Fnot (subst f1 x v))
| (Fimplies f1 f2) => (Fimplies (subst f1 x v) (subst f2 x v))
| (Flet y t f1) => (Flet y (subst_term t x v) (subst f1 x v))
| (Fforall y ty f1) => (Fforall y ty (subst f1 x v))
end.
Unset Implicit Arguments.
Axiom eval_subst : forall (f:fmla) (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(x:Z) (v:Z), (fresh_in_fmla v f) -> ((eval_fmla sigma pi (subst f x v)) <->
(eval_fmla (set sigma x (get pi v)) pi f)).
Axiom eval_swap : forall (f:fmla) (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(id1:Z) (id2:Z) (v1:value) (v2:value), (~ (id1 = id2)) -> ((eval_fmla sigma
(set (set pi id1 v1) id2 v2) f) <-> (eval_fmla sigma (set (set pi id2 v2)
id1 v1) f)).
Axiom eval_change_free : forall (f:fmla) (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z
value)) (id:Z) (v:value), (fresh_in_fmla id f) -> ((eval_fmla sigma (set pi
id v) f) <-> (eval_fmla sigma pi f)).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive stmt :=
| Sskip : stmt
| Sassign : Z -> term -> stmt
| Sseq : stmt -> stmt -> stmt
| Sif : term -> stmt -> stmt -> stmt
| Sassert : fmla -> stmt
| Swhile : term -> fmla -> stmt -> stmt .
Axiom check_skip : forall (s:stmt), (s = Sskip) \/ ~ (s = Sskip).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive one_step : (map Z value) -> (map Z value) -> stmt -> (map Z value)
-> (map Z value) -> stmt -> Prop :=
| one_step_assign : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value)) (x:Z)
(e:term), (one_step sigma pi (Sassign x e) (set sigma x
(eval_term sigma pi e)) pi Sskip)
| one_step_seq : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(sigmaqt:(map Z value)) (piqt:(map Z value)) (i1:stmt) (i1qt:stmt)
(i2:stmt), (one_step sigma pi i1 sigmaqt piqt i1qt) -> (one_step sigma
pi (Sseq i1 i2) sigmaqt piqt (Sseq i1qt i2))
| one_step_seq_skip : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(i:stmt), (one_step sigma pi (Sseq Sskip i) sigma pi i)
| one_step_if_true : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(e:term) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt), ((eval_term sigma pi
e) = (Vbool true)) -> (one_step sigma pi (Sif e i1 i2) sigma pi i1)
| one_step_if_false : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(e:term) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt), ((eval_term sigma pi
e) = (Vbool false)) -> (one_step sigma pi (Sif e i1 i2) sigma pi i2)
| one_step_assert : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(f:fmla), (eval_fmla sigma pi f) -> (one_step sigma pi (Sassert f)
sigma pi Sskip)
| one_step_while_true : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(e:term) (inv:fmla) (i:stmt), (eval_fmla sigma pi inv) ->
(((eval_term sigma pi e) = (Vbool true)) -> (one_step sigma pi
(Swhile e inv i) sigma pi (Sseq i (Swhile e inv i))))
| one_step_while_false : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(e:term) (inv:fmla) (i:stmt), (eval_fmla sigma pi inv) ->
(((eval_term sigma pi e) = (Vbool false)) -> (one_step sigma pi
(Swhile e inv i) sigma pi Sskip)).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive many_steps : (map Z value) -> (map Z value) -> stmt -> (map Z
value) -> (map Z value) -> stmt -> Z -> Prop :=
| many_steps_refl : forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map Z value))
(i:stmt), (many_steps sigma pi i sigma pi i 0%Z)
| many_steps_trans : forall (sigma1:(map Z value)) (pi1:(map Z value))
(sigma2:(map Z value)) (pi2:(map Z value)) (sigma3:(map Z value))
(pi3:(map Z value)) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt) (i3:stmt) (n:Z),
(one_step sigma1 pi1 i1 sigma2 pi2 i2) -> ((many_steps sigma2 pi2 i2
sigma3 pi3 i3 n) -> (many_steps sigma1 pi1 i1 sigma3 pi3 i3
(n + 1%Z)%Z)).
Axiom steps_non_neg : forall (sigma1:(map Z value)) (pi1:(map Z value))
(sigma2:(map Z value)) (pi2:(map Z value)) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt) (n:Z),
(many_steps sigma1 pi1 i1 sigma2 pi2 i2 n) -> (0%Z <= n)%Z.
Axiom many_steps_seq : forall (sigma1:(map Z value)) (pi1:(map Z value))
(sigma3:(map Z value)) (pi3:(map Z value)) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt) (n:Z),
(many_steps sigma1 pi1 (Sseq i1 i2) sigma3 pi3 Sskip n) ->
exists sigma2:(map Z value), exists pi2:(map Z value), exists n1:Z,
exists n2:Z, (many_steps sigma1 pi1 i1 sigma2 pi2 Sskip n1) /\
((many_steps sigma2 pi2 i2 sigma3 pi3 Sskip n2) /\
(n = ((1%Z + n1)%Z + n2)%Z)).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition valid_fmla(p:fmla): Prop := forall (sigma:(map Z value)) (pi:(map
Z value)), (eval_fmla sigma pi p).
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition valid_triple(p:fmla) (i:stmt) (q:fmla): Prop := forall (sigma:(map
Z value)) (pi:(map Z value)), (eval_fmla sigma pi p) ->
forall (sigmaqt:(map Z value)) (piqt:(map Z value)) (n:Z),
(many_steps sigma pi i sigmaqt piqt Sskip n) -> (eval_fmla sigmaqt piqt q).
Axiom consequence_rule : forall (p:fmla) (pqt:fmla) (q:fmla) (qqt:fmla)
(i:stmt), (valid_fmla (Fimplies pqt p)) -> ((valid_triple p i q) ->
((valid_fmla (Fimplies q qqt)) -> (valid_triple pqt i qqt))).
Axiom skip_rule : forall (q:fmla), (valid_triple q Sskip q).
Axiom assign_rule : forall (q:fmla) (x:Z) (id:Z) (e:term), (fresh_in_fmla id
q) -> (valid_triple (Flet id e (subst q x id)) (Sassign x e) q).
Axiom seq_rule : forall (p:fmla) (q:fmla) (r:fmla) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt),
((valid_triple p i1 r) /\ (valid_triple r i2 q)) -> (valid_triple p
(Sseq i1 i2) q).
Axiom if_rule : forall (e:term) (p:fmla) (q:fmla) (i1:stmt) (i2:stmt),
((valid_triple (Fand p (Fterm e)) i1 q) /\ (valid_triple (Fand p
(Fnot (Fterm e))) i2 q)) -> (valid_triple p (Sif e i1 i2) q).
Axiom assert_rule : forall (f:fmla) (p:fmla), (valid_fmla (Fimplies p f)) ->
(valid_triple p (Sassert f) p).
(* Why3 goal *)
Theorem assert_rule_ext : forall (f:fmla) (p:fmla), (valid_triple (Fimplies f
p) (Sassert f) p).
intros f p.
red.
intros s pi Hp s' pi' n Hred.
inversion Hred; subst; clear Hred.
inversion H; subst; clear H.
inversion H0; subst; clear H0; auto.
inversion H; subst; clear H.
Qed.
(* This file is generated by Why3's Coq driver *)
(* Beware! Only edit allowed sections below *)
Require Import ZArith.
Require Import Rbase.
Require int.Int.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive datatype :=
| Tint : datatype
| Tbool : datatype .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive operator :=
| Oplus : operator
| Ominus : operator
| Omult : operator
| Ole : operator .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition ident := Z.
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive term :=
| Tconst : Z -> term
| Tvar : Z -> term
| Tderef : Z -> term
| Tbin : term -> operator -> term -> term .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Inductive fmla :=
| Fterm : term -> fmla
| Fand : fmla -> fmla -> fmla
| Fnot : fmla -> fmla
| Fimplies : fmla -> fmla -> fmla
| Flet : Z -> term -> fmla -> fmla
| Fforall : Z -> datatype -> fmla -> fmla .
(* Why3 assumption *)
Definition implb(x:bool) (y:bool): bool := match (x,
y) with
| (true, false) => false
| (_, _) => true