GitLab

see #4270

opens #4270

--gz makes also output AIRR .tsv.gz

Closes #4249

See merge request !675

Our main file is .vijdil, and not anymore .vdj.fa (for ages)

closes #4249

see #4269

opens #4269

Fix algo with N in window

Closes #4263

See merge request !672

For some reason it was failing with my g++-5

As trimSequence is used on a representative and as the representative should contain the window we now
make sure that the window is not trimmed.

Fix #4263

No more need to launch scripts from scripts directory

See merge request !670

vidjil-algo: new option --gz to output .vidjil.gz

Closes #4253

See merge request !667

Docker emails

Closes #2760

See merge request !666

Mikaël Salson authored Apr 23, 2020 and Vidjil Team committed Apr 23, 2020

server/web2py/applications/vidjil/scripts/*.sh: No more need to launch scripts from the scripts/ directory

Now we can launch the script from anywhere. With Docker we can even launch a script from the host using docker exec.

Render gitlab links with mkdocs-gitlab-plugin

Closes #4149

See merge request !643

see #1169

Closes #4149

See #4149

Sort configurations, by classification then by name, and also for admins

Closes #4240 and #4241

See merge request !655

thanks to @mikael-s

closes #4253

see #4253

see #4253

This will allow filtering depending on the server that sends emails

Otherwise the directory is created by Docker with root ownership which prevents it from being remove when stopping the environment

This is actually a bad reason: we should run tests inside containers.

Ryan Herbert authored Apr 02, 2020 and Mikaël Salson committed Apr 23, 2020

See #2760

Mathieu Giraud authored Apr 15, 2020 and Mikaël Salson committed Apr 23, 2020

closes #4240

Mathieu Giraud authored Apr 15, 2020 and Mikaël Salson committed Apr 23, 2020

closes #4241

Ryan Herbert authored Jan 07, 2020 and Mikaël Salson committed Apr 23, 2020

use catatnight/postfix image to provide a simple solution
for error notification emails

See #2760

Fix server test

See merge request !668

I'm not sure that the wait_until is properly done when using a variable.
Is the DOM queried each time or is it the value stored in the variable (which doesn't change)?

In the second case we should modify other places in the code

As the button was disabled we couldn't click it, so we make sure it is not disabled.
Additionally we wait for the query to have been performed so that the remainder can
be safely checked.

Doc on how the server review environment are set up

See merge request !661