Commit dd549573 authored by Mikaël Salson's avatar Mikaël Salson

qc32.should-vdj.fa: Segmentation obtained by QC32

In Vidjil the V(D)J assignation is not correct according to QC32. Indeed,
there are 3 correct bases and two mismatches, which seems to be quite high.

Example for #2825
parent 69f7e920
Pipeline #11028 passed with stages
in 14 seconds
......@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ OTHER_SRC=$(wildcard unit-tests/*.cpp)
LIB=../core/vidjil.a ../lib/lib.a
SHOULD=$(wildcard should-get-tests/*.should-get) $(wildcard bugs/*.should-get)
SHOULD_LOG=$(SHOULD:.should-get=.tap)
SHOULD_VDJ_EXPECTED_FAILS=--expected-fails 81
SHOULD_VDJ_EXPECTED_FAILS=--expected-fails 82
SHOULD_LOCUS_EXPECTED_FAILS=--expected-fails 2
SHOULD_VDJ=$(wildcard should-vdj-tests/*.should-vdj.fa)
SHOULD_VDJ_VDJ=$(SHOULD_VDJ:.should-vdj.fa=.1.vdj)
......
# attactgtgccacctgggATgttaggagaaactctt
# V8 attactgtgccacctgggAT |||||||||
# J1 ttattataagaaactctt
>TRGV8*01 3/GTTAGG/8 TRGJ1*02
cacagcgtcttctgtactatgactcctacaactccagggttgtgttggaatcaggaatcagtcgagaaaagtatcatacttatgcaagcacagggaagagccttaaatttatactggaaaatctaattgaacgtgactctggggtctattactgtgccacctgggATgttaggagaaactctttggcagtggaacaacact
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment