Commit a0820485 authored by Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar Jacques-Henri Jourdan
Browse files


parent 1326467d
......@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ Then, for proving the weaker specification of $\enqueue$ and $\dequeue$, one sim
Up to now, we ignore the weakly consistent behavior of the semantics of \mocaml{}.
Up to now, we ignored the weakly consistent behavior of the semantics of \mocaml{}.
In this section, we lift this restriction, and propose a more precise specification for our concurrent queue implementation, which takes into account this aspect.
We will use the separation logic Cosmo~\cite{TODO}% TODO
......@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ In particular, our library guarantees \emph{happens-before} relationships betwee
\item from a dequeuer to the following dequeuers.
These happens-before relationships are important to use the queue in practice.
For example, imagine that thread $A$ enqueues a complex data structure in the queue (say, a hash table).
Then, when thread $B$ dequeues the corresponding cells, one naturally expects that thread $B$ is able to access the data structure as if it were its unique owner (provided, of course, that thread $A$ did not access the data structure once enqueued).
In a weakly consistent memory model, this is only possible if there is a happens-before relationship between enqueueing and dequeuing: otherwise, nothing guarantees that thread $B$ has seen all the changes made by thread $A$ to the data structure.
% TODO : il faut expliquer quelque part comment les relations happens-before s'expriment par des transferts de vues
We are able to express and prove these relationships within \hlog{} as transfers
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment