Fix citations.

papers/icfp2021/local.bib

@@ -130,11 +130,13 @@
   publisher={ACM}
 }
 
-@misc{gueneau2021theorems,
+@article{gueneau2021theorems,
   title={Theorems for Free from Separation Logic Specifications},
-  author={Anonymous},
-  year={2021},
-  note={Under submission at ICFP'21}
+  author={Birkedal, Lars and Dinsdale-Young, Thomas and Guéneau, Armaël and Jaber, Guilhem and Svendsen, Kasper and Tzevelekos, Nikos},
+  journal      = pacmpl,
+  volume = "5",
+  number = "ICFP",
+  year={2021}
 }
 
 @inproceedings{zakowski2018verified,

papers/icfp2021/queue-spec-sc.tex

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ would be unable to open their invariant around the triples shown
 in~\fref{fig:queue:spec:seq}.
 Yet these operations are ``atomic'' in some empirical sense.
 
-The concept of logical atomicity~\cite[\S7]{jung-slides-2019,iris-15} aims at addressing that difficulty.
+The concept of logical atomicity~\cite[\S7]{jacobs2011expressive,jung-slides-2019,iris-15} aims at addressing that difficulty.
 To use it, we substitute ordinary Hoare triples with \emph{logically atomic triples}.
 Just like ordinary triples, they specify a program fragment with a precondition and a postcondition.
 The core difference is that invariants can be opened around a logically atomic triple, regardless of the number of execution steps of the program fragment: in a sense, when a function is specified using a logically atomic triple, one states that said function behaves as if it were atomic.