open Grammar
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *)
(* Items. *)
(* An LR(0) item encodes a pair of integers, namely the index of the
production and the index of the bullet in the production's
right-hand side. *)
(* Both integers are packed into a single integer, using 7 bits for
the bullet position and the rest (usually 24 bits) for the
production index. These widths could be adjusted. *)
(* The function [export] is duplicated in [TableInterpreter]. Do not
modify it; or modify it here and there in a consistent manner. *)
type t = int
let import (prod, pos) =
assert (pos < 128);
(Production.p2i prod) lsl 7 + pos
let export t =
(Production.i2p (t lsr 7), t mod 128)
let marshal (item : t) : int =
item
(* Comparison. *)
let equal (item1 : t) (item2: t) =
item1 = item2
(* Position. *)
let positions (item : t) =
let prod, _ = export item in
Production.positions prod
(* [def item] looks up the production associated with this item in the
grammar and returns [prod, nt, rhs, pos, length], where [prod] is
the production's index, [nt] and [rhs] represent the production,
[pos] is the position of the bullet in the item, and [length] is
the length of the production's right-hand side. *)
let def t =
let prod, pos = export t in
let nt, rhs = Production.def prod in
let length = Array.length rhs in
assert ((pos >= 0) && (pos <= length));
prod, nt, rhs, pos, length
let startnt t =
let _, _, rhs, pos, length = def t in
assert (pos = 0 && length = 1);
match rhs.(0) with
| Symbol.N nt ->
nt
| Symbol.T _ ->
assert false
(* Printing. *)
let print item =
let _, nt, rhs, pos, _ = def item in
Printf.sprintf "%s -> %s" (Nonterminal.print false nt) (Symbol.printaod 0 pos rhs)
(* Classifying items. *)
type kind =
| Shift of Symbol.t * t
| Reduce of Production.index
let classify item =
let prod, _, rhs, pos, length = def item in
if pos = length then
Reduce prod
else
Shift (rhs.(pos), import (prod, pos + 1))
(* Sets of items and maps over items. Hashing these data structures is
specifically allowed, so balanced trees (for instance) would not be
applicable here. *)
module Map = Patricia.Big
module Set = Map.Domain
(* This functor performs precomputation that helps efficiently compute
the closure of an LR(0) or LR(1) state. The precomputation requires
time linear in the size of the grammar. The nature of the lookahead
sets remains abstract. *)
(* The precomputation consists in building the LR(0) nondeterministic
automaton. This is a graph whose nodes are items and whose edges
are epsilon transitions. (We do not care about shift transitions
here.) Lookahead information can be attached to nodes and is
propagated through the graph during closure computations. *)
module Closure (L : Lookahead.S) = struct
type state = L.t Map.t
type node = {
(* Nodes are sequentially numbered so as to allow applying
Tarjan's algorithm (below). *)
num: int;
(* Each node is associated with an item. *)
item: t;
(* All of the epsilon transitions that leave a node have the
same behavior with respect to lookahead information. *)
(* The lookahead set transmitted along an epsilon transition is
either a constant, or the union of a constant and the lookahead
set at the source node. The former case corresponds to a source
item whose trailer is not nullable, the latter to a source item
whose trailer is nullable. *)
epsilon_constant: L.t;
epsilon_transmits: bool;
(* Each node carries pointers to its successors through
epsilon transitions. This field is never modified
once initialization is over. *)
mutable epsilon_transitions: node list;
(* The following fields are transient, that is, only used
temporarily during graph traversals. Marks are used to
recognize which nodes have been traversed already. Lists
of predecessors are used to record which edges have been
traversed. Lookahead information is attached with each
node. *)
mutable mark: Mark.t;
mutable predecessors: node list;
mutable lookahead: L.t;
}
(* Allocate one graph node per item and build a mapping of
items to nodes. *)
let count =
ref 0
let mapping : node array array =
Array.make Production.n [||]
let item2node item =
let prod, pos = export item in
mapping.(Production.p2i prod).(pos)
let () =
Production.iter (fun prod ->
let _nt, rhs = Production.def prod in
let length = Array.length rhs in
mapping.(Production.p2i prod) <- Array.init (length+1) (fun pos ->
let item = import (prod, pos) in
let num = !count in
count := num + 1;
(* The lookahead set transmitted through an epsilon
transition is the FIRST set of the remainder of
the source item, plus, if that is nullable, the
lookahead set of the source item. *)
let constant, transmits =
if pos < length then
let nullable, first = Analysis.nullable_first_prod prod (pos + 1) in
L.constant first, nullable
else
(* No epsilon transitions leave this item. *)
L.empty, false
in
{
num = num;
item = item;
epsilon_constant = constant;
epsilon_transmits = transmits;
epsilon_transitions = []; (* temporary placeholder *)
mark = Mark.none;
predecessors = [];
lookahead = L.empty;
}
)
)
(* At each node, compute transitions. *)
let () =
Production.iter (fun prod ->
let _nt, rhs = Production.def prod in
let length = Array.length rhs in
Array.iteri (fun pos node ->
node.epsilon_transitions <-
if pos < length then
match rhs.(pos) with
| Symbol.N nt ->
Production.foldnt nt [] (fun prod nodes ->
(item2node (import (prod, 0))) :: nodes
)
| Symbol.T _ ->
[]
else
[]
) mapping.(Production.p2i prod)
)
(* Detect and reject cycles of transitions that transmit a lookahead
set.
We need to ensure that there are no such cycles in order to be
able to traverse these transitions in topological order.
Each such cycle corresponds to a set of productions of the form
A1 -> A2, A2 -> A3, ..., An -> A1 (modulo nullable
trailers). Such cycles are unlikely to occur in realistic
grammars, so our current approach is to reject the grammar if
such a cycle exists. Actually, according to DeRemer and Pennello
(1982), such a cycle is exactly an includes cycle, and implies
that the grammar is not LR(k) for any k, unless A1, ..., An are
in fact uninhabited. In other words, this is a pathological
case. *)
(* Yes, indeed, this is called a cycle in Aho & Ullman's book,
and a loop in Grune & Jacobs' book. It is not difficult to
see that (provided all symbols are inhabited) the grammar
is infinitely ambiguous if and only if there is a loop. *)
module P = struct
type foo = node
type node = foo
let n =
!count
let index node =
node.num
let iter f =
Array.iter (fun nodes ->
Array.iter f nodes
) mapping
let successors f node =
if node.epsilon_transmits then
List.iter f node.epsilon_transitions
end
module T = Tarjan.Run (P)
let cycle scc =
let items = List.map (fun node -> node.item) scc in
let positions = List.flatten (List.map positions items) in
let names = String.concat "\n" (List.map print items) in
Error.error
positions
(Printf.sprintf "the grammar is ambiguous.\n\
The following items participate in an epsilon-cycle:\n\
%s" names)
let () =
P.iter (fun node ->
let scc = T.scc node in
match scc with
| [] ->
()
| [ node ] ->
(* This is a strongly connected component of one node. Check
whether it carries a self-loop. Forbidding self-loops is not
strictly required by the code that follows, but is consistent
with the fact that we forbid cycles of length greater than 1. *)
P.successors (fun successor ->
if successor.num = node.num then
cycle scc
) node
| _ ->
(* This is a strongly connected component of at least two
elements. *)
cycle scc
)
(* Closure computation. *)
let closure (items : state) : state =
(* Explore the graph forwards, starting from these items. Marks
are used to tell which nodes have been visited. Build a list of
all visited nodes; this is in fact the list of all items in the
closure.
At initial nodes and when reaching a node through a transition,
record a lookahead set.
When we reach a node through a transition that transmits the
lookahead set found at its source, record its source, so as to
allow re-traversing this transition backwards (below). *)
let this = Mark.fresh() in
let nodes = ref [] in
let rec visit father transmits toks node =
if Mark.same node.mark this then begin
(* Node has been visited already. *)
node.lookahead <- L.union toks node.lookahead;
if transmits then
node.predecessors <- father :: node.predecessors
end
else begin
(* Node is new. *)
node.predecessors <- if transmits then [ father ] else [];
node.lookahead <- toks;
follow node
end
and follow node =
node.mark <- this;
nodes := node :: !nodes;
List.iter
(visit node node.epsilon_transmits node.epsilon_constant)
node.epsilon_transitions
in
Map.iter (fun item toks ->
let node = item2node item in
visit node (* dummy! *) false toks node
) items;
let nodes =
!nodes in
(* Explore the graph of transmitting transitions backwards. By
hypothesis, it is acyclic, so this is a topological
walk. Lookahead sets are inherited through transitions. *)
let this = Mark.fresh() in
let rec walk node =
if not (Mark.same node.mark this) then begin
(* Node is new. *)
node.mark <- this;
(* Explore all predecessors and merge their lookahead
sets into the current node's own lookahead set. *)
List.iter (fun predecessor ->
walk predecessor;
node.lookahead <- L.union predecessor.lookahead node.lookahead
) node.predecessors
end
in
List.iter walk nodes;
(* Done. Produce a mapping of items to lookahead sets.
Clear all transient fields so as to reduce pressure
on the GC -- this does not make much difference. *)
List.fold_left (fun closure node ->
node.predecessors <- [];
let closure = Map.add node.item node.lookahead closure in
node.lookahead <- L.empty;
closure
) Map.empty nodes
(* End of closure computation *)
end