GitLab

The fourth argument is the engine; for now, reduced to just the type [env].
This will allow us to describe the type of [feed].

as it will be needed in [InspectionTableInterpreter].

of the third argument [ET]. They will be needed for [feed].

[nonterminal = int], as they will be needed by [feed].

because they can be given safe types only in that setting.

[InspectionTableInterpreter.Make]. This should make it easier
to add new functionality to this functor (which constructs the
inspection API).

of the functors [TableInterpreter.MakeEngineTable] and [Engine.Make].
This should be easier to understand and more flexible.

and [find_default_reduction] in [INCREMENTAL_ENGINE].

The transition is not finished.

They are not cleaned up and (for now) are dead code.

The plan is to use this function in the implementation of [force_reduction],
so we can test dynamically whether a reduction is safe.

This table is large (128kb, for OCaml's grammar) so I will work without it.

which allows testing for the existence of an outgoing transition
in the goto table.