Skip to content

GitLab

Commit 939de4c3 authored by charguer's avatar charguer
Browse files

simplification

parent e80bd62d
Expand all Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
lib/coq/CFLemmasForTactics.v → bin/CFLemmasForTactics.v
View file @ 939de4c3
Set Implicit Arguments.
Require Export LibInt CFSpec CFPrint.
(********************************************************************)
(* ** Lemmas for tactics *)
(** Lemma used by [xframe] *)
Lemma xframe_lemma : forall H1 H2 B Q1 (F:~~B) H Q,
is_local F ->
H ==> H1 \* H2 ->
F H1 Q1 ->
Q1 \*+ H2 ===> Q ->
F H Q.
Proof using. intros. apply* local_wframe. Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xchange] *)
Lemma xchange_lemma : forall H1 H1' H2 B H Q (F:~~B),
is_local F ->
(H1 ==> H1') ->
(H ==> H1 \* H2) ->
F (H1' \* H2) Q ->
F H Q.
Proof using.
introv W1 L W2 M. applys local_wframe __ \[]; eauto.
hsimpl. hchange~ W2. hsimpl~. rew_heap~.
Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xgc_all],
to remove everything from the pre-condition *)
Lemma local_gc_pre_all : forall B Q (F:~~B) H,
is_local F ->
F \[] Q ->
F H Q.
Proof using. intros. apply* (@local_gc_pre H). hsimpl. Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xret] and [xret_no_gc]
for when post-condition unifies trivially *)
Lemma xret_lemma_unify : forall B (v:B) H,
local (fun H' Q' => H' ==> Q' v) H (fun x => \[x = v] \* H).
Proof using.
intros. apply~ local_erase. hsimpl. auto.
Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xret] *)
Lemma xret_lemma : forall HG B (v:B) H (Q:B->hprop),
H ==> Q v \* HG ->
local (fun H' Q' => H' ==> Q' v) H Q.
Proof using.
introv W. eapply (@local_gc_pre HG).
auto. rewrite star_comm. apply W.
apply~ local_erase.
Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xret_no_gc] *)
Lemma xret_no_gc_lemma : forall B (v:B) H (Q:B->hprop),
H ==> Q v ->
local (fun H' Q' => H' ==> Q' v) H Q.
Proof using.
introv W. apply~ local_erase.
Qed.
(** Lemma used by [xpost],
for introducing an evar for the post-condition *)
Lemma xpost_lemma : forall B Q' Q (F:~~B) H,
is_local F ->
F H Q' ->
Q' ===> Q ->
F H Q.
Proof using. intros. applys* local_weaken. Qed.
(********************************************************************)
(* ** Local parameterized formulae *)
(** [is_local_pred S] asserts that [is_local (S x)] holds for any [x].
It is useful for describing loop invariants. *)
Definition is_local_pred A1 B (S:A1->~~B) :=
forall x, is_local (S x).
(********************************************************************)
(* ** While-loops *)
Lemma while_loop_cf_inv_measure :
forall (I:bool->int->hprop),
forall (F1:~~bool) (F2:~~unit) H (Q:unit->hprop),
(exists b m, H ==> I b m \* (Hexists G, G)) ->
(forall b m, F1 (I b m) (fun b' => I b' m)) ->
(forall m, F2 (I true m) (# Hexists b m', \[0 <= m' < m] \* I b m')) ->
(Q = fun _ => Hexists m, I false m) ->
(_While F1 _Do F2 _Done) H Q.
Proof using.
introv (bi&mi&Hi) Hc Hs He. applys~ local_weaken_gc_pre (I bi mi). xlocal.
xextract as HG. clear Hi. apply local_erase. introv LR HR.
gen bi. induction_wf IH: (int_downto_wf 0) mi. intros.
applys (rm HR). xlet. applys Hc. simpl. xif.
xseq. applys Hs. xextract as b m' E. xapplys IH. applys E. hsimpl. hsimpl.
xret_no_gc. subst Q. hsimpl.
Qed.
(********************************************************************)
(* ** For-loops *)
Lemma for_loop_cf_to_inv :
forall I H',
forall (a:int) (b:int) (F:int->~~unit) H (Q:unit->hprop),
(a > (b)%Z -> H ==> (Q tt)) ->
(a <= (b)%Z ->
(H ==> I a \* H')
/\ (forall i, a <= i /\ i <= (b)%Z -> F i (I i) (# I(i+1)))
/\ (I ((b)%Z+1) \* H' ==> Q tt)) ->
(For i = a To b Do F i _Done) H Q.
Proof.
introv M1 M2. apply local_erase. intros S LS HS.
tests C: (a > b).
apply (rm HS). split; intros C'. math. xret_no_gc~.
forwards (Ma&Mb&Mc): (rm M2). math.
cuts P: (forall i, a <= i <= b+1 -> S i (I i) (# I (b+1))).
xapply P. math. hchanges Ma. hchanges Mc.
intros i. induction_wf IH: (int_upto_wf (b+1)) i. intros Bnd.
applys (rm HS). split; intros C'.
xseq. eapply Mb. math. xapply IH; auto with maths; hsimpl.
xret_no_gc. math_rewrite~ (i = b +1).
Qed.
Lemma for_loop_cf_to_inv_gen' :
forall I H',
forall (a:int) (b:int) (F:int->~~unit) H,
(a <= (b)%Z ->
(H ==> I a \* H')
/\ (forall i, a <= i /\ i <= (b)%Z -> F i (I i) (# I(i+1)))) ->
(a > (b)%Z -> H ==> I ((b)%Z+1) \* H') ->
(For i = a To b Do F i _Done) H (# I ((b)%Z+1) \* H').
Proof. intros. applys* for_loop_cf_to_inv. Qed.
Lemma for_loop_cf_to_inv_gen :
forall I H',
forall (a:int) (b:int) (F:int->~~unit) H Q,
(a <= (b)%Z -> H ==> I a \* H') ->
(forall i, a <= i <= (b)%Z -> F i (I i) (# I(i+1))) ->
(a > (b)%Z -> H ==> I ((b)%Z+1) \* H') ->
(# (I ((b)%Z+1) \* H')) ===> Q ->
(For i = a To b Do F i _Done) H Q.
Proof. intros. applys* for_loop_cf_to_inv. intros C. hchange (H2 C). hchange (H3 tt). hsimpl. Qed.
Lemma for_loop_cf_to_inv_up :
forall I H',
forall (a:int) (b:int) (F:int->~~unit) H (Q:unit->hprop),
(a <= (b)%Z) ->
(H ==> I a \* H') ->
(forall i, a <= i /\ i <= (b)%Z -> F i (I i) (# I(i+1))) ->
((# I ((b)%Z+1) \* H') ===> Q) ->
(For i = a To b Do F i _Done) H Q.
Proof. intros. applys* for_loop_cf_to_inv. intros. math. Qed.
Require Export LibInt CFApp CFPrint.
(********************************************************************)
......
bin/CF_xgo.v 0 → 100644
View file @ 939de4c3
(************************************************************)
(* ** [xgo] *)
Inductive Xhint_cmd :=
| Xstop : Xhint_cmd
| XstopNoclear : Xhint_cmd
| XstopAfter : Xhint_cmd
| XstopInside : Xhint_cmd
| Xtactic : Xhint_cmd
| XtacticNostop : Xhint_cmd
| XtacticNoclear : Xhint_cmd
| XsubstAlias : Xhint_cmd
| XspecArgs : list Boxer -> list Boxer -> Xhint_cmd
| Xargs : forall A, A -> Xhint_cmd
| Xlet : forall A, A -> Xhint_cmd
| Xlets : forall A, A -> Xhint_cmd
| Xsimple : Xhint_cmd.
Inductive Xhint (a : tag_name) (h : Xhint_cmd) :=
| Xhint_intro : Xhint a h.
Ltac add_hint a h :=
let H := fresh "Hint" in
lets H: (Xhint_intro a h).
Ltac clear_hint a :=
match goal with H: Xhint a _ |- _ => clear H end.
Ltac clears_hint tt :=
repeat match goal with H: Xhint _ _ |- _ => clear H end.
Ltac find_hint a :=
match goal with H: Xhint a ?h |- _ => constr:(h) end.
Ltac xgo_default solver cont :=
match ltac_get_tag tt with
| tag_ret => xret; cont tt
| tag_fail => xfail; cont tt
| tag_done => xdone; cont tt
| tag_apply => xapp
| tag_seq => xseq; cont tt
| tag_let_val => xval; cont tt
| tag_let_trm => xlet; cont tt
| tag_let_fun => fail
| tag_body => fail
| tag_letrec => fail
| tag_case => xcases_real; cont tt
| tag_casewhen => fail
| tag_if => xif; cont tt
| tag_alias => xalias; cont tt
| tag_match ?n => xmatch; cont tt
| tag_top_val => fail
| tag_top_trm => fail
| tag_top_fun => fail
| tag_for => fail
| tag_while => fail
end.
Ltac xtactic tag := idtac.
Ltac run_hint h cont :=
let tag := ltac_get_tag tt in
match h with
| Xstop => clears_hint tt; idtac
| XstopNoclear => idtac
| XstopAfter =>
match tag with
| tag_let_trm => fail (* todo: xlet_with cont ltac:(fun _ => idtac)*)
| _ => xgo_default ltac:(fun _ => idtac) ltac:(fun _ => idtac)
end
| XstopInside =>
match tag with
| tag_let_trm => fail (*todo: xlet_with ltac:(fun _ => idtac) cont *)
end
| Xtactic => clears_hint tt; xtactic tag
| XtacticNostop => xtactic tag; cont tt
| XtacticNoclear => xtactic tag
| XsubstAlias => xmatch_subst_alias; cont tt
| Xargs ?E =>
match tag with
| tag_let_trm => fail (* todo!!*)
| tag_apply => xapp E (*todo: not needed?*)
end
| XspecArgs (>> ?S) ?E =>
match tag with
| tag_let_trm => fail (* todo!!*)
| tag_apply => xapp_spec S E (*todo: not needed?*)
end
| Xlet ?S =>
match tag with
| tag_let_trm => xlet S; cont tt
| tag_let_fun => xfun_noxbody S
end
| Xsimple => xmatch_simple; cont tt
(* todo : generalize
| tag_case => xcases_real
| tag_if => xif
| tag_match ?n => xmatch
*)
end.
Ltac find_and_run_hint cont :=
let a := ltac_get_label tt in
let h := find_hint a in
clear_hint a;
first [ run_hint h cont | fail 1 ].
Tactic Notation "xhint" :=
find_and_run_hint ltac:(fun _ => idtac).
Ltac xgo_core solver cont :=
first [ find_and_run_hint cont
| xgo_default solver cont ].
Ltac xgo_core_once solver :=
xgo_core solver ltac:(fun _ => idtac).
Ltac xgo_core_repeat solver :=
xgo_core solver ltac:(fun _ => instantiate; try solve [ solver tt ];
instantiate; try xgo_core_repeat solver).
Ltac xgo_pre tt :=
first [ xcf; repeat progress(intros)
| repeat progress(intros)
| idtac ].
Ltac xgo_base solver :=
xgo_pre tt; xgo_core_repeat solver.
Tactic Notation "xgo1" :=
xgo_core_once ltac:(fun _ => idtac).
Tactic Notation "xgo" :=
xgo_base ltac:(fun tt => idtac).
Tactic Notation "xgo" "~" :=
xgo_base ltac:(fun tt => xauto~ ); instantiate; xauto~.
Tactic Notation "xgo" "*" :=
xgo_base ltac:(fun tt => xauto* ); instantiate; xauto*.
Tactic Notation "xgo" constr(a1) constr(h1) :=
add_hint a1 h1; xgo.
Tactic Notation "xgo" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; xgo.
Tactic Notation "xgo" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) ","
constr(a3) constr(h3) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; add_hint a3 h3; xgo.
Tactic Notation "xgo" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) ","
constr(a3) constr(h3) "," constr(a4) constr(h4) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; add_hint a3 h3; add_hint a4 h4; xgo.
Tactic Notation "xgo" "~" constr(a1) constr(h1) :=
add_hint a1 h1; xgo~.
Tactic Notation "xgo" "~" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; xgo~.
Tactic Notation "xgo" "~" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) ","
constr(a3) constr(h3) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; add_hint a3 h3; xgo~.
Tactic Notation "xgo" "~" constr(a1) constr(h1) "," constr(a2) constr(h2) ","
constr(a3) constr(h3) "," constr(a4) constr(h4) :=
add_hint a1 h1; add_hint a2 h2; add_hint a3 h3; add_hint a4 h4; xgo~.
Tactic Notation "xgos" :=
xgo; hsimpl.
Tactic Notation "xgos" "~" :=
xgos; auto_tilde.
Tactic Notation "xgos" "*" :=
xgos; auto_star.
examples/DemoMake/Auxi.ml 0 → 100644
View file @ 939de4c3
let f x = x
\ No newline at end of file
examples/DemoMake/Main.ml
View file @ 939de4c3
open NullPointers
let g x = Aux.f x
let g x = Auxi.f x
examples/DemoMake/Main_proof.v
View file @ 939de4c3
Require Export CFLib Main_ml.
Require Import Aux_ml Aux_proof Extra.
Require Import Auxi_ml Auxi_proof Extra.
Lemma g_spec :
Spec g (x:int) |R>> R \[] (fun y => \[same x y]).
......
lib/coq/CFApp.v
View file @ 939de4c3
Set Implicit Arguments.
Require Export LibCore LibEpsilon Shared.
Require Export CFHeaps CFApp.
Require Export CFHeaps.
Open Local Scope heap_scope_advanced.
Hint Extern 1 (_ ===> _) => apply rel_le_refl.
......@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Hint Extern 1 (_ ===> _) => apply rel_le_refl.
Based on [eval], we define [app_basic f x H Q], which is a like [eval]
modulo frame and weakening and garbage collection.
On top of [app_basic], we define [App f xs H Q], which describes the
On top of [app_basic], we define [app f xs H Q], which describes the
evaluation of a call to [f] on the arguments described by the list [xs].
We also define a predicate [curried n f] which asserts that the function
......@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ Hint Extern 1 (_ ===> _) => apply rel_le_refl.
applications are partial.
The characteristic formula generated for a function application
[f x y z] is "App f [x y z]".
[f x y z] is "app f [x y z]".
The characteristic formula generated for a function definition
[let f x y z = t] is:
[curried 3 f /\ (forall x y z H Q, CF(t) H Q -> App f [x y z] H Q)].
[curried 3 f /\ (forall x y z H Q, CF(t) H Q -> app f [x y z] H Q)].
These definitions are correct and sufficient to reasoning about all
function calls, including partial and over applications.
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Axiom eval : forall A B, func -> A -> heap -> B -> heap -> Prop.
(********************************************************************)
(* ** Definition and properties of the primitive App predicate *)
(* ** Definition and properties of the primitive app predicate *)
(** The primitive predicate [app_basic], which makes a [local]
version of [eval]. *)
......@@ -132,133 +132,139 @@ Notation "[ x1 x2 x3 x4 ]" := ((dyn x1)::(dyn x2)::(dyn x3)::(dyn x4)::nil)
Notation "[ x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ]" := ((dyn x1)::(dyn x2)::(dyn x3)::(dyn x4)::(dyn x5)::nil)
(at level 0, x1 at level 0, x2 at level 0, x3 at level 0, x4 at level 0, x5 at level 0) : dynlist.
Bind Scope dynlist with dyn list.
Delimit Scope dynlist with dyns.
(*Bind Scope dynlist with list.*)
Delimit Scope dynlist with dynlist.
(********************************************************************)
(* ** Definition of [App] and properties *)
(* ** Definition of [app] and properties *)
(** Definition of [App f xs], recursive. *)
(** Definition of [app f xs], recursive.
Can be written, e.g. Notation [app f [x y z] H Q] *)
Fixpoint AppDef (f:func) (xs:list dynamic) B (H:hprop) (Q:B->hprop) : Prop :=
Fixpoint app_def (f:func) (xs:list dynamic) {B} (H:hprop) (Q:B->hprop) : Prop :=
match xs with
| nil => False
| (dyn x)::nil => app_basic f x H Q
| (dyn x)::xs =>
app_basic f x H
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ AppDef g xs H' Q])
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ app_def g xs H' Q])
end.
(** Notation [App f [x y z]] *)
(*
TODO: does not seem to work, hence the work-around using the notation below
Arguments app f%dummy_scope xs%dynlist B%type_scope H%heap_scope Q%heap_scope.
*)
Notation "'App' f xs" :=
(@AppDef f xs _) (* (@AppDef f (xs)%dynlist _) *)
Notation "'app' f xs" :=
(@app_def f (xs)%dynlist _) (* (@app_def f (xs)%dynlist _) *)
(at level 80, f at level 0, xs at level 0) : charac.
Open Scope charac.
Open Scope charac.
Definition demo_arglist :=
forall f (xs:list int) (x y:int) B H (Q:B->hprop),
App f [ x y ] H Q.
(* TODO: find a way that the parentheses are not printed around "App" *)
app f [ x y ] H Q.
(* Print demo_arglist. *)
(* TODO: find a way that the parentheses are not printed around "app" *)
(** Reformulation of the definition *)
Lemma App_ge_2_unfold :
Lemma app_ge_2_unfold :
forall (f:func) A (x:A) (xs:list dynamic) B (H:hprop) (Q:B->hprop),
(xs <> nil) ->
App f ((dyn x)::xs) H Q
app f ((dyn x)::xs) H Q
= app_basic f x H
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ AppDef g xs H' Q]).
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ app_def g xs H' Q]).
Proof using.
intros. destruct xs. false. auto.
Qed.
Lemma App_ge_2_unfold' :
Lemma app_ge_2_unfold' :
forall (f:func) A (x:A) (xs:list dynamic) B (H:hprop) (Q:B->hprop),
(length xs >= 1)%nat ->
App f ((dyn x)::xs) H Q
app f ((dyn x)::xs) H Q
= app_basic f x H
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ AppDef g xs H' Q]).
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ app_def g xs H' Q]).
Proof using.
intros. rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold. destruct xs; rew_list in *.
intros. rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold. destruct xs; rew_list in *.
math.
introv N. false.
Qed.
Lemma App_ge_2_unfold_extens :
Lemma app_ge_2_unfold_extens :
forall (f:func) A (x:A) (xs:list dynamic) B,
(xs <> nil) ->
AppDef f ((dyn x)::xs) (B:=B)
app_def f ((dyn x)::xs) (B:=B)
= (fun H Q => app_basic f x H
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ AppDef g xs H' Q])).
(fun g => Hexists H', H' \* \[ app_def g xs H' Q])).
Proof using.
introv N. applys func_ext_2. intros H Q. rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold.
introv N. applys func_ext_2. intros H Q. rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold.
Qed.
(** Weaken-frame-gc for [App] -- auxiliary lemma for [App_local]. *)
(** Weaken-frame-gc for [app] -- auxiliary lemma for [app_local]. *)
Lemma App_wgframe : forall B f xs H H1 H2 (Q1 Q:B->hprop),
App f xs H1 Q1 ->
Lemma app_wgframe : forall B f xs H H1 H2 (Q1 Q:B->hprop),
app f xs H1 Q1 ->
H ==> (H1 \* H2) ->
(Q1 \*+ H2) ===> (Q \*+ (Hexists H', H')) ->
App f xs H Q.
app f xs H Q.
Proof using.
intros B f xs. gen f. induction xs as [|[A x] xs]; introv M WH WQ. false.
tests E: (xs = nil).
simpls. applys~ local_wgframe M.
rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold. rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold in M.
rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold. rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold in M.
applys~ local_wframe M. intros g.
hextract as HR LR. hsimpl (HR \* H2). applys* IHxs LR.
Qed.
Lemma App_weaken : forall B f xs H (Q Q':B->hprop),
App f xs H Q ->
Lemma app_weaken : forall B f xs H (Q Q':B->hprop),
app f xs H Q ->
Q ===> Q' ->
App f xs H Q'.
app f xs H Q'.
Proof using.
introv M W. applys* App_wgframe. hsimpl. intros r. hsimpl~ \[].
introv M W. applys* app_wgframe. hsimpl. intros r. hsimpl~ \[].
Qed.
(* DEPRECATED
Lemma App_frame : forall B f xs H H' (Q:B->hprop),
App f xs H Q ->
App f xs (H \* H') (Q \*+ H').
Lemma app_frame : forall B f xs H H' (Q:B->hprop),
app f xs H Q ->
app f xs (H \* H') (Q \*+ H').
Proof using.
intros B f xs. gen f. induction xs as [|[A x] xs]; introv M. false.
tests E: (xs = nil).
simpls. applys~ local_wframe M.
rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold. rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold in M.
rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold. rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold in M.
applys~ local_wframe M. intros g.
hextract as HR LR. hsimpl (HR \* H'). applys* IHxs.
Qed.
Lemma App_weaken : forall B f xs H (Q Q':B->hprop),
App f xs H Q ->
Lemma app_weaken : forall B f xs H (Q Q':B->hprop),
app f xs H Q ->
Q ===> Q' ->
App f xs H Q'.
app f xs H Q'.
Proof using.
intros B f xs. gen f. induction xs as [|[A x] xs]; introv M W. false.
tests E: (xs = nil).
simpls. applys~ local_weaken_post M.
rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold'. rewrite~ App_ge_2_unfold' in M.
rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold'. rewrite~ app_ge_2_unfold' in M.
applys~ local_weaken_post M. intros g. hsimpl. rew_heap. applys* IHxs.
Qed.
*)
(** Local property for [App] *)
(** Local property for [app] *)
Lemma App_local : forall f xs B,
xs <> nil -> is_local (AppDef f xs (B:=B)).
Lemma app_local : forall f xs B,
xs <> nil -> is_local (app_def f xs (B:=B)).
Proof using.
introv N<